MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137696823 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002745

WNT16 Influences Bone Mineral Density, Cortical Bone Thickness, Bone Strength, and Osteoporotic Fracture Risk

2012· review· en· W2137696823 on OpenAlexafffund
Hou‐Feng Zheng, Jonathan H. Tobias, Emma L. Duncan, David M. Evans, Joel Eriksson, Lavinia Paternoster, Laura M. Yerges-Armstrong, Terho Lehtimäki, Ulrica Bergström, Mika Kähönen, Paul Leo, Olli T. Raitakari, Marika Laaksonen, Geoffrey C. Nicholson, Jorma Viikari, Leo‐Pekka Lyytikäinen, Carolina Medina‐Gómez, Fernando Rivadeneira, Richard L. Prince, Harri Sievänen, William D. Leslie, Dan Mellström, John A. Eisman, Sofia Movérare‐Skrtic, David Goltzman, David A. Hanley, Graeme Jones, Beaté St Pourcain, Yongjun Xiao, Nicholas J. Timpson, George Davey Smith, Ian R. Reid, Susan M. Ring, Philip N. Sambrook, Magnus K. Karlsson, Elaine Dennison, John P. Kemp, Patrick Danoy, Adrian Sayers, Scott G. Wilson, Maria Nethander, Eugène McCloskey, Liesbeth Vandenput, Richard Eastell, Jeff Liu, Tim D. Spector, Braxton D. Mitchell, Elizabeth A. Streeten, Robert Brommage, U. Pettersson, Matthew A. Brown, Claes Ohlsson, J. Brent Richards, Mattias Lorentzon

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Genetics · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of ManitobaMontreal Heart InstituteMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthNovo Nordisk FondenTurun Yliopistollinen KeskussairaalaSvenska LäkaresällskapetNational Health and Medical Research CouncilEmil Aaltosen SäätiöVetenskapsrådetSuomen KulttuurirahastoStiftelsen för Strategisk ForskningJuho Vainion SäätiöUniversity of BristolAustralian Cancer Research FoundationTampereen TuberkuloosisäätiöKelaNovo NordiskPaavo Nurmen SäätiöJewish General HospitalKing's College LondonDairy Farmers of CanadaAcademy of FinlandChronic Disease Research FoundationNational Institute on AgingNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchEuropean CommissionKempe FoundationWellcome Trust
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenome-wide association studySNPBone mineralBone densityInternal medicineBiologyGenetic associationAlleleOsteoporosisGeneticsEndocrinologyMedicineGeneGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We aimed to identify genetic variants associated with cortical bone thickness (CBT) and bone mineral density (BMD) by performing two separate genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses for CBT in 3 cohorts comprising 5,878 European subjects and for BMD in 5 cohorts comprising 5,672 individuals. We then assessed selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for osteoporotic fracture in 2,023 cases and 3,740 controls. Association with CBT and forearm BMD was tested for ∼2.5 million SNPs in each cohort separately, and results were meta-analyzed using fixed effect meta-analysis. We identified a missense SNP (Thr>Ile; rs2707466) located in the WNT16 gene (7q31), associated with CBT (effect size of -0.11 standard deviations [SD] per C allele, P = 6.2 × 10(-9)). This SNP, as well as another nonsynonymous SNP rs2908004 (Gly>Arg), also had genome-wide significant association with forearm BMD (-0.14 SD per C allele, P = 2.3 × 10(-12), and -0.16 SD per G allele, P = 1.2 × 10(-15), respectively). Four genome-wide significant SNPs arising from BMD meta-analysis were tested for association with forearm fracture. SNP rs7776725 in FAM3C, a gene adjacent to WNT16, was associated with a genome-wide significant increased risk of forearm fracture (OR = 1.33, P = 7.3 × 10(-9)), with genome-wide suggestive signals from the two missense variants in WNT16 (rs2908004: OR = 1.22, P = 4.9 × 10(-6) and rs2707466: OR = 1.22, P = 7.2 × 10(-6)). We next generated a homozygous mouse with targeted disruption of Wnt16. Female Wnt16(-/-) mice had 27% (P<0.001) thinner cortical bones at the femur midshaft, and bone strength measures were reduced between 43%-61% (6.5 × 10(-13)<P<5.9 × 10(-4)) at both femur and tibia, compared with their wild-type littermates. Natural variation in humans and targeted disruption in mice demonstrate that WNT16 is an important determinant of CBT, BMD, bone strength, and risk of fracture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations295
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS GeneticsSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207