MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137750237 · doi:10.1002/anie.201310386

On the Stability of a POC<sub>sp3</sub>OP‐Type Pincer Ligand in Nickel(II) Complexes

2014· article· en· W2137750237 on OpenAlexaff
Jingjun Hao, Berline Mougang‐Soumé, Boris Vabre, Davit Zargarian

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPincer movementHydroaminationChemistryNickelLigand (biochemistry)CatalysisMedicinal chemistryAlkylPincer ligandPhosphiniteStereochemistryDecompositionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe the results of a study on the stabilities of pincer-type nickel complexes relevant to catalytic hydroalkoxylation and hydroamination of olefins, C-C and C-X couplings, and fluorination of alkyl halides. Complexes [(POCsp3 OP)NiX] are stable for X=OSiMe3 , OMes (Mes=1,3,5-Me3 C6 H2), NPh2, and CC-H, whereas the O(tBu) and N(SiMe3)2 derivatives decompose readily. The phenylacetylide derivative transforms gradually into the zero-valent species cis-[{κ(P),κ(C),κ(C')-(iPr2 POCH2 CHCH2 )}Ni{η(2),κ(C),κ(C')-(iPr2 P(O)CCPh)}]. Likewise, attempts to prepare [(POCsp3 OP)NiF] gave instead the zwitterionic trinuclear species [{(η(3) -allyl)Ni}2-{μ,κ(P),κ(O)-(iPr2 PO)4 Ni}]. Characterization of these two complexes provides concrete examples of decomposition processes that can dismantle POCsp3 OP-type pincer ligands by facile C-O bond rupture. These results serve as a cautionary tale for the inherent structural fragility of pincer systems bearing phosphinite donor moieties, and provide guidelines on how to design more robust analogues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207