The T-786→C Mutation in Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Is Associated With Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the pathogenic mechanisms involved in predisposing individuals to hypertension are not well defined, evidence is accumulating that suggests a strong genetic transmission. Animal studies and some clinical investigations have revealed that aberrant NO production may be an important contributing factor. Indeed, a missense mutation in the endothelial NO gene caused by a Glu298Asp alteration has been strongly associated with essential hypertension, coronary artery spasm, and myocardial infarction. Recently, another point mutation caused by a T-786-->C transition in the 5'-flanking region of the endothelial NO synthase gene has been identified and, like the Glu298Asp mutation, is associated with coronary artery spasm. The present study was conducted to determine the effect of the T-786-->C point mutation on hypertension. We investigated the interaction between the endothelial NO synthase T-786-->C polymorphism and blood pressure in a large (n=705) clinically healthy population. Allele frequencies for the T and C alleles were 62% and 38%, translating into 39%, 46% and 15% of the population having the T/T, T/C, and C/C genotypes, respectively, for the T-786-->C point mutation. Subjects with the C/C genotype had significantly higher systolic blood pressures and were 2.16(95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.7) more likely to be hypertensive. Therefore, the -786 C/C genotype in NO synthase is a significant contributing factor for increasing the risk of essential hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".