MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2137973174 · doi:10.1186/1710-1492-10-s1-a48

Are known biomarkers for asthma present in early infancy?

2014· article· en· W2137973174 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
M Ayanna Boyce, Sanja Stanojevic, Krzysztof Kowalik, Susan Balkovec, Félix Ratjen, Malcolm R. Sears, Padmaja Subbarao

Bibliographic record

VenueAllergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhaled nitric oxideAsthmaMedicineBiomarkerCohortExhalationPulmonary function testingLongitudinal studyPediatricsCohort studyEosinophilicAirwayInternal medicineSpirometryPathologyAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exhaled nitric oxide (FE NO ) is a biomarker for eosinophilic airway inflammation [ 1 ]. Elevated FE NO has been proposed as a marker for diagnosing asthma and predicting asthma exacerbations [ 2 ]. We wished to examine the association between known asthma risk factors and FE NO . A sub cohort of children (n=222) participating in the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) study underwent infant pulmonary function tests (IPFTs) during the first year of life. Risk factors were obtained from a subset of available CHILD questionnaires administered prenatally and 3 times during the first year of life. FE NO was collected using a multiple-breath sampling technique during quiet tidal breathing at the 3 month visit, 1 year visit, or both visits. Prenatal smoke exposure was defined as any maternal smoking, including mothers who stopped or cut down on smoking during pregnancy. Postnatal smoke exposure was defined as any exposure in or away from the home up to 1 year of age. Parental asthma was defined as self-reported or doctor diagnosed asthma. Parental atopic status was confirmed by allergy skin tests. T-tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons were used to compare FE NO in the exposed and unexposed groups (α=0.004). At the 3 month visit, 134 infants attended the IPFT lab, and 84 of 117 attempted eNO tests were successfully analyzed; mean FE NO was 16.8±8.1ppb. At the 1 year visit, 181 infants attended the IPFT lab and 138 of 158 attempted eNO tests were successfully analyzed; mean FE NO was 15.3±9.7ppb. Prenatal smoking rates were low (3% and 6%) and showed no association with FE NO (Table 1 ). Postnatal smoke exposure was also not associated with FE NO . FE NO was not statistically different in infants whose mothers or fathers had a history of asthma or atopic status, compared to those without. Having siblings was not significantly associated with FE NO after applying the Bonferroni correction. Smoke exposure was not related to FE NO , however no nicotine biomarker was assessed and smoking rates were low. Maternal and paternal histories were not associated with FE NO levels in healthy children up to 1 year of age. None of the risk factors were statistically significantly associated with FE NO , however infants with siblings were observed to have a lower FE NO than infants without siblings at the 1 year visit. A larger sample size is required to increase the power of these tests. Further factors must be studied to explain the variation in FE NO measures seen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAllergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology→Same topicAsthma and respiratory diseases→French-language works237,207→