Bibliographic record
Abstract
The British Columbia Rural Health Video Network Link initiative strove to provide quality educational experiences, clinical consultations, and clinical service support to the population of nine physicians in Vanderhoof during the period from November 1, 2001, to November 30, 2002. The purpose of this study was to perform an evaluation of the project with a particular focus on the continuing medical education component (CME). A needs assessment, two focus groups, six CME rounds delivered via videoconference, and a final site visit, were the foci for evaluating project effectiveness. Participants reacted positively to all six sessions, reporting a moderate to high level of agreement that the videoconference medium provided the best way of delivering CME material. The findings suggest that the needs-based CME rounds were effective in fulfilling the educational requests of physicians, positively influencing their clinical practices, and improving patient care. However, the only way this group of physicians will welcome the technology again is in the form of a sustainable initiative with guaranteed funding and 24-hour, highly reliable access. Therefore, future telehealth delivery into other rural communities should follow the Telehealth Uptake Strategy, first described in this paper, with a funding guarantee for three to five years, which includes the provision of a project coordinator and identification and cooperation of a local "change agent" with administrative support. The Shared Provincial Access Network/Provincial Learning Network is underutilized and offers an opportunity to bridge the CME access gap between rural and urban physicians. The network was very reliable between the hours of 0730-0900 and 1500-2000, exceeding 95% problem-free connectivity. The evaluation produced 23 recommendations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".