High mortality after pelvis and lower limb fractures in ESRD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sir, The high mortality rate associated with hip fracture in the general population, as well as in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population, is well described. However, the mortality associated with pelvis and lower limb fractures in ESRD patients remains unknown. We reviewed the medical records of all chronic haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis patients hospitalized at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital for a fracture from 1 July 1995 to 1 February 2007. Femoral neck, pelvis, femoral condyle, tibial plateau, patella, tibia and malleolus fractures were considered. Femoral neck and pelvis fractures were analysed separately, while the other fractures were analysed together as lower limb fractures. All patients who died during the study period were identified and mortality rates were calculated. During the 127-month-long study period, 60 dialysis patients were hospitalized for a total of 68 fractures. Seven patients had two fracture episodes, and one patient had three fracture episodes. The three most common fracture sites were hip (40 cases), pelvis (13 cases) and malleolus (8 cases) (Table 1). The 1-year mortality rate after a hip fracture was 42.5% (17 patients), with an in-hospital mortality rate of 20%. Two patients died during their hospitalization for a pelvis or lower limb fracture. One-year mortality rates were 30.8% after a pelvis fracture and 20% after a lower limb fracture. Median survival during the observation period was 427 days after a pelvis fracture and 581 days after a lower limb fracture. One-year mortality by fracture type Hip fracture is associated with a 1-year mortality rate of 24% in the general population [1]. In ESRD, the 1-year mortality rate after a hip fracture approximates 50% [2]. Our results are consistent with previously reported mortality rates. Few studies have described the mortality associated with pelvis or lower limb fractures in the general population. In a British study, the 1-year mortality rates were 8.7% after pelvis fracture and 2.4% after a lower limb fracture [3]. In our ESRD cohort, the 1-year mortality rates for pelvis and lower limb fractures were increased 3.5- and 8.3-fold, respectively. In fact, the impact of pelvis and lower limb fractures on mortality in ESRD patients appears very similar to the impact of hip fracture in the general population. Like hip fractures [4,5], pelvis and lower limb fractures are probably markers of poor nutritional and general health status in this population. With a 1-year mortality rate similar to that of hip fracture in the general population, our data delineate for the first time the poor outcomes associated with pelvis and lower limb fractures in ESRD patients. The incidence, risk factors, clinical and functional outcomes of such fractures in ESRD patients need to be evaluated in larger, registry-based studies. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".