MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2138047192 · doi:10.1183/09031936.00120506

Long-term treprostinil in pulmonary arterial hypertension: is the glass half full or half empty?

2006· letter· en· W2138047192 on OpenAlexaff
S. Provencher

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Respiratory Journal · 2006
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreprostinilMedicineTerm (time)Pulmonary hypertensionCardiologyInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has traditionally been considered as an inevitably fatal disease. In the 1980s, a national registry funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) described the natural history of idiopathic PAH 1. The median survival was <3 yrs and prognosis was mostly related to baseline functional capacity and pulmonary haemodynamics. In case series, the long-term outcome of patients with PAH associated with connective tissue disease, portal hypertension and HIV infection appeared to be even worse 2. This was before the era of PAH-specific therapies. In the last decade, significant advances in the current understanding of the disease have led to the development of new specific treatments. In 1996, a placebo-controlled trial demonstrated significant survival benefit with i.v. epoprostenol in idiopathic PAH patients 3. Several other therapies, including prostacyclin analogues, endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors, were subsequently evaluated in short-term randomised placebo-controlled trials. These studies demonstrated improvements in pulmonary haemodynamics, exercise capacity and quality of life 4–6. This new era of therapy has clearly brought enthusiasm among physicians. From a clinician's perspective, the glass has been half filled. Treprostinil s.c. was evaluated in a large randomised placebo-controlled trial involving 470 PAH patients randomised to either s.c. treprostinil or placebo 7. Over a 12-week period, s.c. treprostinil improved patients’ exercise capacity, PAH-related symptoms and haemodynamics. The median placebo-corrected increase in 6-min walking distance was 16 m, with greater improvements in severely ill patients at baseline and in those who could tolerate the highest doses. Unfortunately, this short-term trial, as with others, was underpowered and not designed to detect survival benefit. Indeed, the most ill patients are no longer entered into placebo-controlled …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Respiratory Journal→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→