MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138077452 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeu188

Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by CT angiography for identification of high-risk coronary artery lesions: a comparison to optical coherence tomography

2014· article· en· W2138077452 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVulnerable plaqueFibrous capOptical coherence tomographyCalcificationIntravascular ultrasoundHounsfield scaleComputed tomography angiographyCoronary artery diseaseRadiologyCardiologyInternal medicineAngiographyComputed tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Adverse plaque characteristics (APCs) by coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) are associated with myocardial ischaemia and future acute coronary syndromes. The overall objective was to determine whether APCs on non-invasive CTA are associated with vulnerable plaque features by invasive optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-eight coronary plaques in 45 patients were evaluated by CTA and OCT. APCs by CTA were: positive remodelling (PR), remodelling index ≥1.10; low attenuation plaque (LAP), any intraplaque voxel <30 Hounsfield units; spotty calcification (SC), intraplaque calcification ≤3 mm; and 'napkin-ring' sign, low intraplaque attenuation surrounded by a higher attenuation rim. OCT evaluated plaques for thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA, ≤65 µm, lipid arch >90°) and macrophage infiltration. Increasing plaque vulnerability was graded by OCT as having no TCFA, TCFA without macrophage infiltration, and TCFA with macrophage infiltration. OCT lesions included those with no TCFA (n = 44), TCFA without macrophage infiltration (n = 7), and TCFA with macrophage infiltration (n = 17). Increasing plaque vulnerability grade by OCT was associated with higher diameter stenosis (43.6 vs. 40.7 vs. 57.3%, P = 0.01), and greater prevalence of PR (11 vs. 43 vs. 71%, P < 0.001), LAP (11 vs. 29 vs. 59%, P = 0.001), and SC (2 vs. 29 vs. 18%, P = 0.02), but not for napkin-ring sign (P = 0.18). In multivariable analysis, PR [odds ratio (OR) 16.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-73.3, P < 0.001] and LAP (OR 11.2, 95% CI 2.8-44.3, P = 0.001) predicted TCFA with macrophage infiltration, whereas SC and napkin-ring sign did not. CONCLUSION: Plaques demonstrating PR and LAP by CTA are associated with TCFA with macrophage infiltration by OCT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it