MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138145511 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1008587107

Biophysical information representation in temporally correlated spike trains

2010· article· en· W2138145511 on OpenAlexafffund
William H. Nesse, Leonard Maler, André Longtin

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsStimulus (psychology)Computer scienceSensory systemBiological systemNeuroscienceSpike trainAdaptation (eye)Spike (software development)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)BiologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spike trains commonly exhibit interspike interval (ISI) correlations caused by spike-activated adaptation currents. Here we investigate how the dynamics of adaptation currents can represent spike pattern information generated from stimulus inputs. By analyzing dynamical models of stimulus-driven single neurons, we show that the activation states of the correlation-inducing adaptation current are themselves statistically independent from spike to spike. This paradoxical finding suggests a biophysically plausible means of information representation. We show that adaptation independence is elicited by input levels that produce regular, non-Poisson spiking. This adaptation-independent regime is advantageous for sensory processing because it does not require sensory inferences on the basis of multivariate conditional probabilities, reducing the computational cost of decoding. Furthermore, if the kinetics of postsynaptic activation are similar to the adaptation, the activation state information can be communicated postsynaptically with no information loss, leading to an experimental prediction that simple synaptic kinetics can decorrelate the correlated ISI sequence. The adaptation-independence regime may underly efficient weak signal detection by sensory afferents that are known to exhibit intrinsic correlated spiking, thus efficiently encoding stimulus information at the limit of physical resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207