G-Protein–Coupled Receptor Kinase Activity in Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Impaired receptor-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activation has been observed in lymphocytes from hypertensive subjects and has been linked to an increase in lymphocyte G-protein receptor kinase-2 (GRK-2) protein expression. However, whether the increase in lymphocyte GRK-2 reflected an increase in vascular GRK-2 was unknown. Therefore, we compared GRK-2 protein expression in lymphocytes and aortas obtained from normotensive Wistar rats, Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY), and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and from aortas of Dahl rats. Impaired beta-adrenergic responsiveness was observed in lymphocytes and vascular tissues obtained from hypertensive SHR (10 and 15 weeks old) but not in those obtained from prehypertensive SHR (5 weeks old). Immunodetectable lymphocyte GRK-2 protein expression was increased in 10-week-old SHR (143+/-10% of the expression in 10-week-old Wistar rats and 131+/-11% of the expression in 10-week-old WKY, n=5 in each group). Immunodetectable vascular smooth muscle cell GRK-2 was comparably increased (169+/-14% of the expression in Wistar rats and 138+/-7% of the expression in WKY, n=5 in each group). Also, in hypertensive Dahl salt-sensitive rats, vascular GRK-2 protein expression was increased (185+/-14% of the expression in Dahl salt-resistant rats, n=5 in each group) compared with Dahl salt-resistant controls. These studies support a generalized defect in vascular GRK-2 protein expression in hypertension, which could be an important factor in the impairment of beta-adrenergic-mediated vasodilation, characteristic of the hypertensive state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".