MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Age of primiparity and implications of early reproduction on life history in female Columbian ground squirrels

2004· article· en· W2138231447 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peter Neuhaus, David Broussard, Jan O. Murie, F. Stephen Dobson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Ecology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLitterReproductionHibernation (computing)LongevityOffspringBiologyPopulationReproductive successLife historyWeaningEcologyZoologyDemographyPregnancyAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Factors leading to differences in age of primiparity and possible life‐history implications arising from these differences were studied in a population of Columbian ground squirrels ( Spermophilus columbianus ; Ord, 1815). We used data collected from 1992 to 2000 on two neighbouring colonies of ground squirrels in south‐eastern Alberta, Canada. Earlier born females were more likely to wean successfully a litter at the age of 2. Among 2‐year‐old females, those who emerged earlier and heavier from hibernation were more likely to wean offspring than those females who emerged later and lighter from hibernation. The presence of the mother had a significant positive impact on reproductive output in 2‐year‐old females. Although there was a positive correlation between lifetime reproductive success and age at death, there was no difference in lifetime reproductive success or in age at death, depending on age of primiparity. For individual females, litter size at weaning at 2 years old did not differ from that at 3 years old. We conclude that body condition, presence or absence of the mother and environmental conditions are the main factors leading to differences in age of first successful reproduction in Columbian ground squirrels. Previous breeding experience does not seem to play a role in determining reproductive success. Finally, differences in age of first successful reproduction do not seem to have an effect on lifetime reproductive success or longevity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal EcologySame topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207