MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First report of <i>Impatiens</i> downy mildew ( <i>Plasmopara obducens</i> ) in the UK

2005· article· en· W2138338556 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles R. Lane, Paul A. Beales, T. M. O’Neill, G. M. McPherson, A. R. Finlay, J. C. David, O. Constantinescu, B. Henricot

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Pathology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyDowny mildewImpatiensGenBankSporangiumBotanyRibosomal DNAGeneticsPhylogeneticsGeneSpore

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In early June 2003, a sample of Impatiens walleriana Firefly Series from southern England was found with symptoms of a downy mildew. Infected leaves appeared paler green than normal, with a white, downy growth developing on lower surfaces. Symptoms were initially inconspicuous but lower leaf surfaces quickly became covered with fungus-like growth and premature leaf fall was common. Stunting of plants and poor flowering were also observed. Collapse of plants could be very rapid, especially under humid conditions, resulting in up to 80% losses. Two downy mildews have been described on Impatiens: the more commonly described Plasmopara obducens (syn. Peronospora obducens) on wild and cultivated Impatiens spp. (Sohi & Tyagi, 1974); and the less well-known fungus Bremiella sphaerosperma (Constantinescu, 1991). Detailed examination of a representative sample (IMI 390985) revealed the sporangiophores were monopodially branched at the base, individual branches did not arise in a distinct pattern, apical branchlets were at right angles to the main axis and there was no apical thickening – all characteristics of P. obducens. The identification was supported by DNA sequencing. The 5′ end of the nuclear DNA coding for the large ribosomal subunit (LSU rDNA) was amplified by PCR using the primers NL1 and NL4, according to Maier et al. (2003). The sequence of the amplified product was obtained and deposited in GenBank (AY587558). Comparison of the sequence of the LSU rDNA region with other sequences available in the GenBank database revealed that it was almost identical, with only one base pair substitution, to P. obducens found on I. capensis in the USA (AY035522). Following the initial discovery, the Plant Health and Seeds Inspectorate (PHSI) Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs carried out a survey of growers, resulting in several further findings of P. obducens on a range of cultivars, in addition to samples from commercial growers, civic floral displays, private gardens and growers from around the UK. PHSI inspections revealed no evidence of downy mildew on wild impatiens around nurseries. There are no previous reports of a downy mildew on wild or cultivated Impatiens spp. in the UK (Francis & Waterhouse, 1988), although P. obducens has been found in other parts of Europe as well as Canada, the USA, Guatemala, Central Asia, China, India, Korea and Russia (D. Jones, personal communication). Statutory plant health action continues to be taken against this regulated disease in the UK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant PathologySame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207