Concentration of Astragalus Polysaccharide by Polysulfone-Activated Carbon Modified with Nitric Acid Blend Ultrafiltration Membranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, Astragalus polysaccharides were concentrated by ultrafiltation membranes prepared by blending polysulfone (PSF) with activated carbon modified with nitric acid(HAC) by immersion precipitation phase inversion method. Water flux and retention to bovine serum albumin of the membranes were investigated. The morphology of membranes were also observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In order to obtain best concentration performance, effects of operating pressure, feeding temperature, operating time, feeding concentration and pH value on concentration and extraction of astragalus polysaccharide were studied. The best conditions for concentration were as follows: operating pressure is 0.4 MPa, feeding temperature is 25 °C, feeding concentration is 1 g·L-1, pH value is neutral. Under these conditions, the ultrafiltration membrane flux was 62.6 L·m-2·h-1, the retention to astragalus polysaccharide was 91.2%, and the attenuation rate of water flux was 12.5% in one hour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".