MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RNase Y is responsible for uncoupling the expression of translation factor IF3 from that of the ribosomal proteins L35 and L20 in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>

2011· article· en· W2138418103 on OpenAlexaff
Patrice Bruscella, Karen Shahbabian, Soumaya Laalami, Harald Putzer

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRNase PEndoribonucleaseOperonRNase MRPRibosomal proteinTranscription (linguistics)Messenger RNARNARibosomal RNAMolecular biologyCell biologyGeneticsGeneRibosomeEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RNase Y is a novel endoribonuclease affecting global mRNA metabolism. We show that this nuclease affects the expression of the Bacillus subtilis infC-rpmI-rplT operon, encoding translation initiation factor IF3 and the ribosomal proteins L35 and L20. This operon is autoregulated by a complex L20-dependent transcription attenuation mechanism. L20 binds to a phylogenetically conserved domain on the 5' untranslated region of the infC mRNA which mimics the L20 binding sites on 23S rRNA. We have identified a second promoter (P1) upstream of the previously identified promoter (P2). The P1, but not the P2, readthrough transcript is stabilized in a strain depleted for RNase Y. However, under these conditions infC biosynthesis is repressed threefold. We show that the unprocessed P1 transcript is non-functional for IF3 translation but fully competent to express the co-transcribed ribosomal protein genes. RNase Y cleavage of the P1 transcript creates an entry site for the 5'-3' exonucleolytic activity of RNase J1 which degrades the infC mRNA when translation initiation efficiency is low. A second RNase Y cleavage is crucial for initiating degradation of the prematurely terminated infC leader RNAs, including the L20 operator complex, which permits efficient recycling of the L20 protein.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207