Neurochemical excitation of propriospinal neurons facilitates locomotor command signal transmission in the lesioned spinal cord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies of the in vitro neonatal rat brain stem-spinal cord showed that propriospinal relays contribute to descending transmission of a supraspinal command signal that is capable of activating locomotion. Using the same preparation, the present series examines whether enhanced excitation of thoracic propriospinal neurons facilitates propagation of the locomotor command signal in the lesioned spinal cord. First, we identified neurotransmitters contributing to normal endogenous propriospinal transmission of the locomotor command signal by testing the effect of receptor antagonists applied to cervicothoracic segments during brain stem-induced locomotor-like activity. Spinal cords were either intact or contained staggered bilateral hemisections located at right T1/T2 and left T10/T11 junctions designed to abolish direct long-projecting bulbospinal axons. Serotonergic, noradrenergic, dopaminergic, and glutamatergic, but not cholinergic, receptor antagonists blocked locomotor-like activity. Approximately 73% of preparations with staggered bilateral hemisections failed to generate locomotor-like activity in response to electrical stimulation of the brain stem alone; such preparations were used to test the effect of neuroactive substances applied to thoracic segments (bath barriers placed at T3 and T9) during brain stem stimulation. The percentage of preparations developing locomotor-like activity was as follows: 5-HT (43%), 5-HT/N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA; 33%), quipazine (42%), 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (20%), methoxamine (45%), and elevated bath K(+) concentration (29%). Combined norepinephrine and dopamine increased the success rate (67%) compared with the use of either agent alone (4 and 7%, respectively). NMDA, Mg(2+) ion removal, clonidine, and acetylcholine were ineffective. The results provide proof of principle that artificial excitation of thoracic propriospinal neurons can improve supraspinal control over hindlimb locomotor networks in the lesioned spinal cord.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".