Imaging Changes in Synaptic Acetylcholine Availability in Living Human Subjects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: In vivo estimation of β(2)-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor availability with molecular neuroimaging is complicated by competition between the endogenous neurotransmitter acetylcholine and the radioligand (123)I-3-[2(S)-2-azetidinylmethoxy]pyridine ((123)I-5-IA). We examined whether binding of (123)I-5-IA is sensitive to increases in extracellular levels of acetylcholine in humans, as suggested in nonhuman primates. METHODS: Six healthy subjects (31 ± 4 y) participated in a (123)I-5-IA SPECT study. After baseline scans, physostigmine (1-1.5 mg) was administered intravenously over 60 min, and 9 additional scans were obtained. RESULTS: We observed a significant reduction in the total volume of distribution after physostigmine administration (29% ± 17% in the cortex, 19% ± 15% in the thalamus, 19% ± 15% in the striatum, and 36% ± 30% in the cerebellum; P < 0.05). This reduction reflected a combination of a region-specific 7%-16% decrease in tissue concentration of tracer and a 9% increase in plasma parent concentration. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that increases in acetylcholine compete with (123)I-5-IA for binding to β(2)-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Additional validation of this paradigm is warranted, but it may be used to interrogate changes in extracellular acetylcholine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".