Down Regulation of CD4 Expression following Isolation and Culture of Human Monocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The down regulation of CD4 by cultured monocytes has been observed by our group and by other investigators. Flow cytometric experiments were done to examine which factors might influence this phenomenon. The addition of lipopolysaccharide, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, macrophage colony-stimulating factor, or interleukin-10 to monocyte cultures failed to inhibit the decrease in monocyte CD4 expression routinely observed following overnight culture. The down regulation was an adherence-independent phenomenon and was not influenced by the type of anticoagulant into which the peripheral blood was collected or by the presence or absence of lymphocytes within the cultures. The avoidance of the use of Ficoll-Paque to isolate peripheral blood mononuclear cells did not prevent monocyte CD4 down regulation. Finally, by tagging monocyte CD4 with an anti-CD4 phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal antibody prior to culture, we were able to determine that the down regulation observed was the result of the internalization of the molecule. At this time, we conclude that the observed down regulation of monocyte CD4 is probably due to the differentiation of blood monocytes into tissue culture-derived macrophages rather than to some artifact of the isolation procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".