The Reaction of Ketenylidenetriphenylphosphorane (Ph<sub>3</sub>P˭C˭C˭O) with Acidic H‒E (E˭O, N) Bonds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reactivity of ketenylidenetriphenylphosphorane (1) with the protic reagents 2,4,6-trimethylphenol (7), 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (8), and diphenylamine (9) has been explored. Three novel carbonyl-stabilized ylides have been synthesized and characterized. Crystal structures were obtained for Ph3PCHC(O)O(C6H2Me3) (11), Ph3PCHC(O)O(C6H2t-Bu2Me) (12), and Ph3PCHC(O)NPh2 (13), respectively. These products were then methylated in an attempt to develop a new route to low-valent carbon compounds. Crystals of [Ph3PCH(CH3)C(O)O(C6H2Me3)]I (14) were isolated and characterized but this route did not prove to be synthetically useful, at least toward the goal of preparing low-valent carbon-centered materials. Finally, 1 was also reacted with the bulky tin reagent, bis[bis(trimethylsilyl)amido]tin(II), in the presence of 2,4,6-trimethylphenol. A complex mixture of products was obtained, from which crystals of an unusual chelated tin compound (15) were isolated and characterized using X-ray crystallography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".