MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138557710 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2013-0640

p- and n-type microcrystalline silicon oxide (μc-SiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>:H) for applications in thin film silicon tandem solar cells

2014· article· en· W2138557710 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vladimir Smirnov, Andreas Lambertz, S. Tillmanns, F. Finger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz
KeywordsTandemSiliconMicrocrystalline siliconMicrocrystallineCrystallinityThin filmOxideBand gapCrystalline siliconSolar cellOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical engineeringPhysicsMaterials scienceNanotechnologyCrystallographyComposite materialAmorphous siliconChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the development and application of p- and n-type hydrogenated microcrystalline silicon oxide (μc-SiO x :H) alloys in tandem thin film silicon solar cells. Our results show that the optical, electrical, and structural properties of μc-SiO x :H can be conveniently tuned over a wide range to fulfil the requirements for solar cell applications. We have shown that adding of PH 3 gas during deposition tends to increase crystallinity of μc-SiO x :H layers, while additional trimethylboron (TMB) tends to suppress crystalline growth. When applied in tandem solar cells, both p- and n-type μc-SiO x :H lead to a remarkable increase in the top cell current. Taking advantage of low refractive index and high optical band gap of μc-SiO x :H allows the achievement of high efficiencies of 13.1% (initial) and 11.8% (stabilized).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.781

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207