MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Post‐natal Changes of Cyclin‐dependent Kinase 5 Activator Expression in the Developing Rat Cerebellum

2005· article· en· W2138566080 on OpenAlexaff
Young‐Gil Jeong, K. Y. Lee, B. C. Lee, N. S. Lee, Moo‐Ho Won, Yoshinori Fukui

Bibliographic record

VenueAnatomia Histologia Embryologia · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyclin-dependent kinase 5CerebellumBiologyActivator (genetics)Purkinje cellCell biologyAnatomyMolecular biologyNeuroscienceKinaseProtein kinase AReceptorCyclin-dependent kinase 2Biochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

cDNA of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) was cloned based on its primary sequence homology to Cdc2 and Cdk2. Cdk5 requires the neuronal Cdk5 activators such as p35 or p39(nck5ai) (p39) for its activity. In this study, we examined post-natal changes in the p39 expression pattern during the development of the rat cerebellum. p39 began to express in somata and dendrites of Purkinje cells at post-natal day 3 (PD3). In particular, at PD12, parasagittal bands (stripes) with p39 immunoreactivity were weakly observed. At PD21, p39-immunoreactive stripes were developed when compared with the PD12 group. At this age stage, p39 immunoreactivity became weak in somata of Purkinje cells, not forming stripes. At PD28, a series of parasagittal bands were more distinct than those of the PD21 group, and p39 immunoreactivity disappeared in Purkinje cells, not forming p39 immunoreactive stripes. In the adults, p39 immunoreactivity in Purkinje cells was similar to that found in the PD28 group which showed that parasagittal bands were very narrow, and became progressively more slender. Therefore, we suggest that the post-natal changes of p39 expression in Purkinje cells in the cerebellum is an autonomous characteristic of Purkinje cells with a role of Cdk5 activators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnatomia Histologia EmbryologiaSame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207