Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report is the sixth of a series of reports that form part of a larger project on the British Columbia Trustee Act and related laws that is aimed at introducing reforms that will allow the law to meet the present-day requirements of trusteeship. Many provisions of on the Trustee Act are out of keeping with present-day conditions and practices and some provisions are so seriously outdated as to be significant obstacles to efficient trust administration. This project is being carried forward on behalf of the BCLI by a our Trustee Act Modernization Committee whose members were appointed by the board of the BCLI to reflect the wills and trusts Bar, the professional fiduciary sector, and academic specialists in trust law.During the course of the Committee’s work a decision with significant implications emerged that has generated a large measure of concern among Canadian charities. In Re Christian Brothers of Ireland in Canada the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that assets held as a special purpose charitable trust by a charity were available to satisfy the claims of creditors even where those claims arose out of circumstances wholly unrelated to the special purpose trust.In the Committee’s view this decision constitutes a serious distortion of the law of trusts. Since the circumstances of the case are such that no further appeal is likely, the Committee is concerned that this holding may be more widely adopted unless steps are taken. The Committee has, therefore, recommended that remedial legislation, in the form of a restatement, be enacted (with an appropriate saving for the rights of the parties in the Christian Brothers case itself).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".