Membrane Ruffles Capture C3bi-opsonized Particles in Activated Macrophages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A widespread belief in phagocyte biology is that FcgammaR-mediated phagocytosis utilizes membrane pseudopods, whereas Mac-1-mediated phagocytosis does not involve elaborate plasma membrane extensions. Here we report that dynamic membrane ruffles in activated macrophages promote binding of C3bi-opsonized particles. We identify these ruffles as components of the macropinocytosis machinery in both PMA- and LPS-stimulated macrophages. C3bi-particle capture is facilitated by enrichment of high-affinity Mac-1 and the integrin-regulating protein talin in membrane ruffles. Membrane ruffle formation and C3bi-particle binding are cytoskeleton dependent events, having a strong requirement for F-actin and microtubules (MTs). MT disruption blunts ruffle formation and PMA- and LPS-induced up-regulation of surface Mac-1 expression. Furthermore, the MT motor, kinesin participates in ruffle formation implicating a requirement for intracellular membrane delivery to active membrane regions during Mac-1-mediated phagocytosis. We observed colocalization of Rab11-positive vesicles with CLIP-170, a MT plus-end binding protein, at sites of particle adherence using TIRF imaging. Rab11 has been implicated in recycling endosome dynamics and mutant Rab11 expression inhibits both membrane ruffle formation and C3bi-sRBC adherence to macrophages. Collectively these findings represent a novel membrane ruffle "capture" mechanism for C3bi-particle binding during Mac-1-mediated phagocytosis. Importantly, this work also demonstrates a strong functional link between integrin activation, macropinocytosis and phagocytosis in macrophages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".