MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138670809 · doi:10.4141/cjss09012

Fractionnement de la fertilisation azotée dans la production du bleuet nain sauvage et suivi de l’azote du sol

2010· article· en· W2138670809 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jean Lafond

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBerry genetics and cultivation research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVegetative reproductionFertilizerNitrogenAmmonium nitrateGrowing seasonAgronomyHorticultureChemistryAnimal scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In wild lowbush blueberry production, fertilizers are applied in the spring of the vegetative year. To increase fertilizers efficiency and to reduce environmental losses, fertilizer split applications between vegetative and production year have been proposed. The objectives of this project were to determine the effect of split application of the nitrogen (N) in the vegetative and production year on the wild blueberry production and on soil mineral N in six blueberry fields located in Saguenay-Lac-Saint Jean (Quebec, Canada). Four rates of ammonium sulfate were applied in the spring of the vegetative year (0, 30, 60 and 90 kg ha -1 ). These same rates were applied in the spring of the vegetative (50%) and production (50%) years. The 30 kg N ha -1 rate was also applied only in the production year. For all sites, maximum fruit yields (3800 kg ha -1 ) were obtained with 62 kg N ha -1 . However, the maximum rate ranged from 25 to 90 kg N ha -1 according to the sites. Applying N in the vegetative and production years had comparable fruits yields to those obtained with the fertilizer applied only in the vegetative year. One month after N application, the amount of N-NH 4 in the soil profile increased by 4 to 38 kg ha -1 compared with the control. Split N application reduced by 55 to 76% the amount of NH 4 -N in soil layers only in the vegetative year. Soil nitrate increased with N rates at the end of the growing season, indicating that a part of NH 4 -N was nitrified and can be potentially leached the under root zone. According to the various maximum N rates obtained and N fertilizer impacts on soil N mineral, there would be no agronomic or environmental benefit to splitting low rates (<30 kg ha -1 ). However, with higher rates, splitting N between vegetation and production years would maximize fruit yields and reduce environmental risk.Key words: Maximum N rate, ammonium, nitrate, Vaccinium angustifolium Ait., split fertilization

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicBerry genetics and cultivation researchFrench-language works237,207