Erosion‐dependant continuity development in high viscosity ratio blends of very low interfacial tension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This work studies continuity development and cocontinuity in high viscosity ratio EPDM/PP blends. A very low interfacial tension (0.3 mN/m) between the blend components together with high viscosity ratios (11 and 17) result in a variety of unusual morphological features, including isolated nanometer diameter fibers, very large particles, partially coalesced particles, and numerous particles interconnected by fibers. This unique combination of morphologies leads the blend to a novel and stable cocontinuous structure of partially coalesced particles and particles interconnected by fibers. Compared with low to medium viscosity ratio EPDM/PP blends, these cocontinuous networks demonstrate early percolation thresholds, rapid continuity development, and attain cocontinuity at lower compositions of minor phase. The slow surface erosion of the high viscosity EPDM phase during melt blending is shown to be responsible for the generation of these unusual morphological structures. Typically the timescale for erosion phenomena are so small that they have defied study in the mixing environment itself and typical blend morphology studies almost always examine the final steady‐state morphology obtained after several minutes of mixing. The combination of very low interfacial tension and very high viscosity ratios of these EPDM/PP systems provide a unique opportunity to examine erosion phenomena persisting over longer time scales during melt mixing. We propose a new concentration‐dependant erosion mechanism that is based on particle collision–coalescence–separation dynamics. The proposed conceptual mechanism is shown to dramatically accelerate the erosion process and maintain cocontinuity over prolonged periods of mixing. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 1919–1929, 2006
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".