Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical myocarditis is uncommon in infants and children. The most common pathogen is Coxsackievirus B. The offending agent triggers an immune response, which results in myocardial edema with subsequent impairment of systolic and diastolic function. Newborns and infants are more severely affected because the immature myocardium has limited ways of adapting to an acute insult. Children typically present with sinus tachycardia and gallop on auscultation, cardiomegaly on chest x-ray and small voltages on electrocardiogram. The echocardiogram shows reduced ventricular function. Viral studies can isolate the pathogen. Myocardial biopsy is useful diagnostically, but carries a significant risk for the sick infant. The first line of treatment includes measures such as rest, oxygen and diuretics. Inotropic agents are useful in moderate to severe heart failure. The role of immunosuppressive therapy is not yet clearly established in the paediatric age group. Prognosis is guarded in newborns but more favourable in older children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".