MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138762378 · doi:10.1071/rdv20n1ab13

13 STRATEGIES TO INCREASE OVULATORY FOLLICLE SIZE AND REDUCE OVULATION TIME IN LACTATING DAIRY COWS

2007· article· en· W2138762378 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J.O. Giordano, J. Lannett Edwards, G.M. Schuenemann, N. R. Rohrbach, F. N. Schrick

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvulationFollicular phaseEstrous cycleOocyteFollicleAnimal scienceEndocrinologyGonadotropinBreedInternal medicineFollicle-stimulating hormoneAndrologyBiologyHormoneLuteinizing hormoneMedicineEmbryo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In vitro exposure of oocytes to elevated temperatures hastened oocyte maturation; furthermore, performing IVF of heat-stressed oocytes 5 h earlier than the usual 24 h resulted in blastocyst development similar to that of non-heat-stressed controls (Edwards et al . 2005 J. Dairy Sci. 88, 4326–4333). If elevated ambient temperatures in vivo alter oocyte maturation in a similar fashion, then new strategies are needed to induce earlier release of the oocyte from the ovulatory follicle. Current objectives were to examine follicular growth after FSH administration and examine whether treatment with FSH and an exogenously induced LH surge would hasten ovulation. On Day 0 (8 to 9 days after estrus) of the experimental period, lactating Holstein cows ( n = 31; 65–115 days in milk; 1–6 lactations) received an EAZI-BREED CIDR (Pfizer Animal Health, New York, NY, USA) plus 100 µg of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH, IM; Cystorelin, Merial Ltd, Iselin, NJ, USA). On Day 7, CIDRs were removed and cows were administered 500 µg cloprostenol (IM; Estrumate, Schering-Plough Animal Health, Union, NJ, USA). Concurrently, cows were randomly allocated to receive either 80 mg FSH (FSH; n = 15; Folltropin-V, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, ON, Canada) or 4 mL of sterile saline (SAL; n = 16). Forty-eight h later (Day 9), cows within the FSH and SAL groups were randomly subdivided to receive either a 100-µg dose of Cysterolin (GnRH) or 3000 IU of hCG (hCG, IM; Chorulon, Intervet Inc., Millsboro, DE, USA) generating 4 treatment combinations (FSH/GnRH, n = 3; FSH/hCG, n = 7; SAL/GnRH, n = 8; and SAL/hCG, n = 8). Ovarian activity was assessed by ultrasonography to evaluate growth of the ovulatory follicle. Following CIDR removal, frequent ultrasonography was utilized to confirm ovulation (disappearance of the dominant follicle). Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Five cows from the FSH group were removed from the combination treatment due to ovulation occurring before 48 h post-CIDR removal. Size of the ovulatory follicle at time of GnRH or hCG administration was not different between FSH or SAL groups (16.7 ± 0.7 v . 17.5 ± 0.6 mm, respectively). Total growth of the ovulatory follicle from CIDR removal to ovulation did not differ between FSH (3.04 ± 0.7 mm) and SAL (2.75 ± 0.7 mm)-treated cows. As calculated from time of CIDR removal, ovulation occurred earlier in FSH (63.6 ± 4.5 h) than in SAL (77.2 ± 4.4 h; P < 0.05)-treated cows. Combination of FSH/GnRH produced the earliest ovulation (74 ± 1.2 h) which was different only from FSH/hCG (78.6 ± 0.8 h; P < 0.05), but not from SAL/GnRH or SAL/hCG (77 ± 0.8 and 78 ± 0.8 h, respectively). Regardless of FSH or SAL treatment, cows treated with GnRH ovulated earlier than those treated with hCG (75.5 ± 0.7 v . 78.3 ± 0.6 h, respectively; P < 0.05). In conclusion, while FSH was unable to increase the size of the ovulatory follicle, earlier ovulation occurred when given alone or in combination with GnRH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207