MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138778467 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2008.4616753

A new wide dynamic range CMOS pulse-frequency-modulation digital image sensor with in-pixel variable reference voltage

2008· article· en· W2138778467 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Chen, Fei Yuan, Gul N. Khan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPixelDynamic rangeImage sensorCMOSElectronic engineeringPulse-frequency modulationComputer scienceTime delay and integrationModulation (music)Dot pitchHigh dynamic rangeVoltageWide dynamic rangePulse-width modulationElectrical engineeringPulse (music)Pulse-amplitude modulationEngineeringComputer visionPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new pulse-frequency-modulation (PFM) digital pixel sensor (DPS) with an in-pixel variable reference voltage generator to increase the resolution of the pixel, especially when the level of illumination is low. The proposed PFM DPS offers the attractive characteristics of a reduced integration time when the level of illumination is low, reduced complexity of routing and silicon cost, and comparable fill factor as that of conventional PFM DPS, however, with a significantly improved dynamic range. The proposed digital image sensor is implemented in TSMC-0.18 mum 1.8 V CMOS technology and validated using Spectre with BSIM3V3 device models. Simulation results demonstrate that the PFM digital pixel has a dynamic range of 150 dB when integration time is set to 60 mus, approximately 70 dB more than the conventional PFM digital pixel sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207