MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138784160 · doi:10.1353/can.2007.0005

Cleaning, Draining, and Sanitizing the City: Conceptions and Uses of Water in the Montreal Region

2006· article· en· W2138784160 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michèle Dagenais, Caroline Durand

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Governance and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsMateriality (auditing)ShoreWastewaterEmbodied cognitionContext (archaeology)Water consumptionSociologyPolitical scienceGeographyArchaeologyEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceAestheticsLawOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How are political dynamics embodied in the city's materiality, and how, in turn, is the environment used in the moulding of social bonds and power relations? Through an examination of the presence of water in Montreal, in particular of wastewater, this article explores the ways in which this problem, and the solutions advanced to solve it, were constructed and presented. At the turn of the twentieth century, water constituted a central factor in the process of reconfiguring the relations between human beings and natural elements, the effects of which had repercussions on both the relationship between individuals and groups and between city and surrounding areas. This article analyzes certain social and political consequences of this process that transformed the relationship with water, rendering it at once more widespread and more regulated. After presenting the terms on which questions relating to the disposal of wastewater were raised in a context where both the availability of water in the city and its consumption were increasing, the article considers the fallout of wastewater disposal on the shores of the Island of Montreal. On the outskirts of the city, as much as within its boundaries, ways of perceiving and of solving such problems were not only shaped by social and political relations, but also mirrored them. Comment les dynamiques politiques s'incarnent-elles dans la matérialité des villes et comment, en retour, l'environnement est-il mis à contribution dans le modelage des relations sociales et des rapports de pouvoir ? Examinant les débats provoqués par la présence de l'eau à Montréal, en particulier de l'eau souillée, cet article s'interroge sur la manière dont ce problème et les solutions avancées pour le résoudre ont été construits et présentés. Au tournant du XXe siècle, l'eau représente un élément central dans le processus de reconfiguration des relations entre les humains et les éléments naturels dont les incidences se répercutent à la fois sur les rapports entre individus et collectifs et entre ville et milieu environnant. L'article analyse certaines des conséquences sociales et politiques de ce processus qui transforme le rapport à l'eau en le rendant plus généralisé en même temps que plus réglementé. Après une présentation des termes suivants lesquels se posent les problèmes soulevés par l'évacuation de l'eau dans un contexte où sa disponibilité dans la ville et sa consommation s'accroissent, l'article s'attarde aux retombées provoquées par l'évacuation des eaux usées sur les rives de l'île de Montréal. Autant aux marges de la ville qu'à l'intérieur de ses limites, la manière de percevoir les problèmes liés à la gestion de l'eau tout comme de les solutionner se révèle être façonnée par les rapports sociaux et politiques, tout comme elle en constitue une traduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.036
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicWater Governance and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207