Soft Decision Quantization for H.264 With Main Profile Compatibility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study the rate-distortion (RD) optimization of the H.264 main profile encoding. Specifically, a soft decision quantization (SDQ) algorithm is developed based on the context adaptive binary arithmetic coding (CABAC) method in the H.264 main profile. Given motion prediction and quantization step sizes, the proposed SDQ algorithm is proved to achieve near-optimal SDQ for residual coding in the sense of minimizing the true RD cost when the weak adjacent block dependency utilized in CABAC is ignored for optimization. The SDQ algorithm is then used in conjunction with a general RD optimization framework to jointly design motion prediction and residual coding for H.264 main profile coding given previously coded reference frames. Experiments have been conducted based on the reference encoder JM82 of H.264 main profile. Comparative studies show that the joint design method achieves on average 10% rate reduction at the same PSNR when compared with the RD method in the H.264 main-profile reference software, with half of the reduction coming from the proposed SDQ algorithm, and 20% rate reduction at the same PSNR when compared with the RD method in the H.264 baseline-profile reference software.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".