Diriger une école primaire de milieu urbain défavorisé: les perceptions des directions d’écoles à propos de leur travail
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur les perceptions des directions d’ecoles de milieu defavorise a propos de leur travail. Nous nous interessons a la situation qui prevaut a Montreal, ou les ecoles beneficient de mesures particulieres de soutien du Ministere de l’Education, du Loisir et du Sport. Nous presentons les resultats d’une recherche menee aupres de quarante-cinq directions d'ecoles primaires de milieu defavorise de Montreal. L’objectif principal etait d’identifier, de decrire et de documenter les caracteristiques du travail d’une direction d’ecole de milieu defavorise. Quelques constats emergent des donnees recueillies. Les directions considerent leur tâche differente de celle des directions d’une ecole de milieu moyen ou favorise. Ces differences portent principalement sur la lourdeur de la tâche, sur les competences et les attitudes particulieres requises, sur la necessite d’exercer un leadership de justice sociale, sur la necessite de developper une certaine vision de l’education et finalement sur l’importance du developpement professionnel. Mots-cles: Direction d’ecole, ecole primaire, rapport au travail, milieu defavorise, discours
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".