MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138949454 · doi:10.4141/cjss2011-056

Long-term effect of fresh and composted cattle manure on the size and nutrient composition of dry-sieved soil aggregates

2012· article· en· W2138949454 on OpenAlexaffvenue
J. J. Miller, E. Bremer, Bruce Beasley, C. F. Drury, Bernie J. Zebarth, Francis J. Larney

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersDivision of Chemistry
KeywordsManureStrawChemistryAnimal scienceFeedlotNutrientDry matterAgronomyOrganic matterBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Miller, J. J., Bremer, E., Beasley, B. W., Drury, C. F., Zebarth, B. J. and Larney, F. J. 2012. Long-term effect of fresh and composted cattle manure on the size and nutrient composition of dry-sieved soil aggregates. Can. J. Soil Sci. 92: 673–683. Application of feedlot manure to cropland may impact the size distribution and nutrient content of soil aggregates. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of fresh or composted feedlot manure containing straw or wood-chip bedding on dry-sieved aggregate size distribution and nutrient contents. Surface (0–15 cm) soil samples were obtained from a long-term field experiment where treatments were fresh (FM) or composted manure (CM) containing straw or wood-chips applied annually at 0 (control) or 77 Mg ha−1yr−1for 11 yr. Air-dried soil samples were separated using a rotary sieve into six aggregate size fractions ranging from <0.47 mm to >12.7 mm. Total C, total N, C:N ratio, soil mineralizable N (41-d incubation), total P, soil test P, and P saturation index were determined on the six aggregate fractions. The amendments significantly (P≤0.05) increased the proportion of smaller (<0.47 mm) aggregates and decreased the proportion of the larger (>12.7 mm) aggregates relative to the unamended control. The geometric mean diameter (GMD) was also lower and wind erodible fraction (WEF) was greater for the amended treatments than unamended control. We attributed this manure effect to increased organic matter content in the soil making the aggregates more friable and susceptible to breakdown by tillage. Carbon, N, and P concentrations were not shifted to smaller aggregate sizes where root growth and nutrient uptake are generally greater. The exception was mineralizable N, which tended to be greater in the finer<0.47 mm fraction. Mineralizable soil N in all aggregate sizes ≥0.47 mm was reduced for wood-chip compared with straw bedding, and resulted in net N immobilization in aggregate sizes ≥1.2 mm. Phosphorus sorption was lower in soil amended with wood-chips compared with straw bedding for aggregates ≥0.47 mm. Long-term manure application may shift soil aggregates from larger to finer fractions because of greater friability and suggests that these soils should be managed to avoid the greater risk of wind erosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207