Stroke and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with rosiglitazone use in elderly diabetic patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective was to evaluate the cardiovascular risks associated with rosiglitazone in diabetic patients. We conducted matched nested case-control studies in a retrospective population-based cohort of all elderly diabetic patients living in Quebec throughout 2001 and 2002. Study end-points were: all-cause and cardiovascular death, hospital admission for AMI, CHF and stroke.Twenty controls per case, matched for age, gender and date of cohort entry, were randomly drawn from each case's risk set. Conditional logistic regressions were adjusted for co-morbidities and other drug exposures. The risk of hospital admission for AMI (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21-1.65) and CHF (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.71-2.19) was increased by the use of rosiglitazone. However, exposure to rosiglitazone was not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69-1.12) and all-causes mortality (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-0.99).The risk of hospital admission for stroke was not significantly affected by rosiglitazone use. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms explaining these associations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".