Active Modified Atmosphere Packaging of Fresh-cut Bell Peppers: Effect on Quality Indices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fresh-cut green bell peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) were stored in modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) made of impermeable high-density polyethylene film. Two in-packaging atmospheres and storage temperatures (0 oC and 5 oC) were tested. The respiration rate of the unpackaged produce and the in-package gas concentration, mass loss, firmness, skin colour, ascorbic acid and visual quality of the packaged produce were estimated. Cutting, increased respiration rate of the unpackaged produce by 24% compared to the intact produce for the same storage temperature. After 5 days of storage at 5 °C, significant O2 depletion of the active modified atmosphere was found. Limited mass loss (0.4-0.5% of the initial mass) and firmness degradation were estimated in both storage temperatures due to the beneficial effect of packaging. The hue angle (h*) reduction was limited in all cases and the initial green colour was preserved. Initial ascorbic acid content was preserved at 0 °C, but significantly increased at 5 °C. The visual quality of the packaged produce was assessed by six trained panelists and found that was not significantly changed at 0 °C storage. In conclusion, the tested active MAP maintained the initial quality indices of fresh-cut peppers (cv. Twingo F1) for up to 10 days at 0 °C but not at 5 °C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".