Expression and localization of c-ros oncogene along the human excurrent duct
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compared to other animals, the anatomy of the human epididymis appears unusual. The caput epididymis is composed mostly of efferent ducts with an undefined initial segment. The present study investigates the regionalization of c-ros in human epididymis by real-time quantitative RT-PCR, in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry studies. C-ros gene encodes a receptor-type protein tyrosine kinase that is expressed in adult mice exclusively in the epithelial cells of the initial segment of the epididymis. Transgenic mice targeted for the c-ros gene lack the initial segment of the epididymis and are infertile. Real-time PCR analysis showed that c-ros mRNA is expressed all along the human epididymis with the exception of the proximal caput epididymidis, where c-ros transcript was undetectable. In situ hydridization revealed that c-ros transcript was strongly expressed by principal cells and to a lower level by basal cells. Immunohistochemical studies showed that c-ros protein distribution was similar to the transcript. These results showed that c-ros expression in the human epididymis differs from that in mice suggesting that the unusual morphology of the human epididymis may reflect species differences in gene expression along the excurrent duct.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".