Effect of Angiotensin AT1 Receptor Blockade on Sympathetic Responses to Handgrip in Healthy Men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To determine whether angiotensin II (ANG II) contributes to the reflex skeletal muscle sympathoexcitation elicited by isometric and isotonic exercise, we tested the hypothesis that angiotensin AT(1) receptor blockade (ARB) would attenuate reflex sympathoneural responses to handgrip (HG) and to post-handgrip ischemia (PHGI). METHODS: Seventeen healthy men were studied before and 1 week after random double-blind crossover allocation to oral losartan (100 mg daily) and placebo. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were recorded at rest, and during 2 min bouts of isotonic HG at 50% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and isometric HG at 30% MVC, performed randomly, each followed by 2 min of PHGI. RESULTS: At rest, losartan doubled plasma renin (P = 0.01) and ANG II (P = 0.03) concentrations, and lowered BP (P < 0.01) yet had no effect on MSNA burst frequency or incidence. HR trended higher (P = 0.060). Losartan's hypotensive effect persisted throughout each exercise bout (P < 0.045). MSNA and HR responses to isotonic exercise and postexercise ischemia were not affected by losartan. Isometric exercise and postexercise ischemia increased MSNA on both sessions (all P < 0.01). Losartan augmented the HR response (P ≤ 0.03), and after losartan MSNA burst frequency (P < 0.01) and incidence (P < 0.04) were significantly higher at all time points, but the magnitude of the MSNA response to isometric exercise and postexercise ischemia was unchanged. CONCLUSION: In healthy men, short-term ARB does not attenuate reflex sympathoneural responses to HG or PHGI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".