MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139112985 · doi:10.1177/8756087906064891

Orientation,Structure and Properties of Double-Bubble Oriented Lldpe Films

2006· article· en· W2139112985 on OpenAlexaff
Arthur Bobovitch, Saïd Elkoun, Abdellah Ajji

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plastic Film & Sheeting · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Foaming and Composites
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear low-density polyethyleneUltimate tensile strengthMaterials scienceLamellar structureMicrostructurePerpendicularComposite materialTear resistanceBubbleFourier transform infrared spectroscopyPolyethyleneMorphology (biology)OpticsGeometryMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biaxially oriented linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) films are produced using the double-bubble process with different machine direction (MD) orientation levels and the same transverse direction (TD) blow-up ratio. Their mechanical behavior is characterized in terms of the tensile strength and tear resistance. The microstructure and orientation are characterized using microscopy, x-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infra red spectroscopy (FTIR). The results indicate that MD tensile strength increases with increasing MD stretching (draw) ratio while the TD tensile decreases. Tear resistance remains mainly constant in TD and decreases in MD with increases in draw ratio. Morphology analysis reveals that overstretching lamellae tend to align perpendicular to MD with an increase of their lamellar dimensions. c-axis orientation of lamellae in MD increases with draw ratio while a-and b-axes orient towards normal direction (ND) and TD respectively. A good correlation is observed between c-axis orientation and MD tear resistance and tensile strength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plastic Film & SheetingSame topicPolymer Foaming and CompositesFrench-language works237,207