Planktonic phosphorus pool sizes and cycling efficiency in coastal and interior British Columbia lakes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary 1. Limnologists have long acknowledged the importance of phosphorus (P) in determining the organism biomass and productivity of lake ecosystems. Despite a relatively large number of studies that have examined P cycling in lake ecosystems, there remain several substantial methodological issues that have impeded our understanding of P cycling in limnetic plankton communities. Two critical issues confronting ecologists are (1) a lack of precise measurements of the dissolved inorganic phosphorus (PO ) and (2) accurate or complete measurements of dissolved P regeneration rates by plankton communities. 2. Here, we examine patterns of epilimnetic planktonic P pool sizes and turnover rates in eight lakes in British Columbia, Canada over a 2‐year period. We determine the concentrations and turnover times of P in various planktonic compartments (dissolved and various planktonic size fractions), using recently developed methods for estimating phosphate concentration and planktonic regeneration rates. 3. The pico‐ and nanoplankton size fraction (0.2–20 μm) played a central role in planktonic P cycling in lakes examined by this study. On average across lakes, pico‐ and nanoplankton contained >60% of the planktonic P, accounted for >90% PO uptake, and contributed 50% of the plankton community dissolved P regeneration rate. 4. PO concentrations determined by steady state bioassays (ssPO ) were extremely low (87–611 pmol L−1) and were 2–3 orders of magnitude less than simultaneously measured colorimetric soluble reactive phosphorus estimates. Lake ssPO concentrations increased linearly with total phosphorus (TP), and the slope of this relationship was approximately 1, indicating that PO remained a consistent proportion of the TP pool across a range of TP concentrations. 5. Turnover rates of the total planktonic P pool and the <20 μm pool became more rapid with increasing lake TP, indicating that, according to this metric, planktonic P cycling efficiency increased with TP concentrations. We also detected a significant relationship between particulate phosphorus (PP) <20 μm turnover time and seston N : P ratios, with PP <20 μm turnover times becoming slower with increasing seston N : P. These findings suggest that long‐standing conceptual models of nutrient cycling that predict slower cycling rates and decreasing cycling efficiency with increasing TP concentrations require further empirical examination. We postulate that patterns in lake P turnover and cycling efficiency are a result of complex interactions between plankton biomass and composition, and the ratios of multiple nutrients (C, N, P), rather than solely a function of the TP pool.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".