MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139148925 · doi:10.1107/s0108270102006297

Enantiomeric bis(μ-<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>′-hexamethylenedisalicylaldiminato)dicopper(II) complexes

2002· article· en· W2139148925 on OpenAlexaff
Tomislav Friščić, Alan J. Lough, George Ferguson, B. Kaitner

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallographyThermogravimetric analysisDifferential scanning calorimetryCrystallizationChemistryEnantiomerCrystal structureInfrared spectroscopyHexaneSpace groupDiffractionStereochemistryX-ray crystallographyPhysicsOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The title dimeric complex, bis[micro-2,2'-[hexane-1,6-diylbis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenolato-1:2kappa(4)O,N:N',O']dicopper(II),[Cu(2)(C(20)H(22)N(2)O(2))(2)], has been investigated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, by thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry, and also by FT-IR spectroscopy. Different synthetic and crystallization procedures gave crystals which were quite different in appearance, and it was initially thought that these were different polymorphic forms. Subsequent structure determination showed, in fact, serendipitous preparation of crystals in the P4(1) space group by one method and in space group P4(3) by the other. In these enantiomorphic structures, the Cu atoms have a distorted flattened tetrahedral coordination, with Cu-N and Cu-O distances in the ranges 1.954 (4)-1.983 (4) and 1.887 (4)-1.903 (4) A, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure CommunicationsSame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207