MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139163430

Making a Living: African Canadian Workers in London, Ontario, 1861-1901

2011· article· en· W2139163430 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tracey L. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisadvantagedWorkforcePolitical scienceHumanitiesEthnologySociologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a growing body of research on African Canadians in the 19th century that touches on their experiences in the workforce. Nonetheless, the literature has been largely silent on how labour market opportunities for African Canadians altered over time and, in particular, how members of this community fared with the slow, but nonetheless dramatic, rise of an industrial-capitalist economy. This study uses census data to explore the occupational experiences of African Canadians living in London, Ontario, between 1861 and 1901. Findings suggest that labour market opportunities were better for men of African origins around mid-century but declined noticeably in the succeeding years. African Canadians of both genders were largely excluded from growth areas in the economy, and their labour was highly concentrated in a narrow range of low-skill jobs. Although there is limited evidence of upward occupational mobility over time for some, and a slight broadening of occupational opportunities by 1901, African Canadian men and women were disadvantaged compared to their white counterparts. Abstract: A l'heure actuelle, on fait davantage de recherche sur les Canadiens d'origine africaine au 19e siecle qui touche a leur experience au travail. Neanmoins, la documentation traite rarement la facon dont les possibilites sur le marche du travail ont change pour les Canadiens d'origine africaine et, en particulier, la facon dont les membres de cette communaute ont reussi dans une economie industrielle et capitaliste en croissance lente, mais toutefois dramatique. Cette etude se sert des donnees du recensement pour explorer l'experience professionnelle des Canadiens d'origine africaine qui vivent a London, Ontario, entre 1861 et 1901. Les resultats suggerent que les possibilites sur le marche du travail etaient meilleures pour les homes d'origine africaine au milieu du siecle mais ont diminue de facon remarquable dans les annees subsequentes. La plupart des Canadiens d'origine africaine des deux sexes n'ont pas profite de la croissance economique et leur travail s'est hautement concentre sur une gamme etroite d'emplois peu specialises. Bien qu'il y ait quelque preuve de mobilite professionnelle ascendante et un leger elargissement de possibilites d'emploi en 1901, les femmes et les hommes canadiens d'origine africaine ont ete desavantages par rapport a leurs homologues blancs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0340.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207