Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study intends to examine the space structure and architectural features of Taoping Village, a traditional Chinese village. We intended to review its living quarter type characteristics and its spatial meaning. A living space formed ca. 2,000 years ago is preserved to the present in Taoping Village; we intend to obtain basic research material by finding the characteristics of living space that has been continued from the past and adapting to the social and natural environment. The village called Taopingqiangsai(桃坪羌寨) is located in Sichuan Province, China. After obtaining material such as basic literature and research results on Taoping Village and carrying out basic analysis, the research team visited the site to rework some books through partial measurements and photo analysis methods. Through this, we intend to analyze the purpose and characteristics of the houses distributed in the village and the entire village’s spatial structure. Based on future research results, we intend to reinterprete the essential meaning of living inherent in Taoping Village.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it