Simulation of Microgravity Diffusion Flames Using Sub-Atmospheric Pressures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ethylene/air laminar diffusion flames were studied at sub-atmospheric pressures to simulate a non-buoyant environment and at super-atmospheric pressures for comparison, at fuel flow rates of 0.48 mg/s and 1.16 mg/s. Flame properties including flame geometry, soot formation and temperature field of the flames were studied. Overall, luminous flame height decreased with decreasing pressure to the point of visible luminosity disappearance, resulting in blue flames at a near vacuum. Flame width increased with decreasing pressure until the flame was almost spherical. Soot formation was also found to decrease with decreasing pressure and existed at very negligible concentrations in a near vacuum. Subatmospheric peak soot volume fractions ranged from about 0.1 ppm to 0.93 ppm at 0.48 mg/s, whereas at 1.16 mg/s, peak soot volume fractions were substantially higher. At subatmospheric pressures, higher fuel flow rates produced flames with higher soot concentrations. Soot production was restricted to an annular region with this annular region shifting closer to the flame centerline with increasing height from the burner. At locations about halfway between the burner rim and the flame tip, soot volume fraction decreased with increasing radial distance from the flame centerline. These results are consistent for both high and low pressure flames. The annular soot formation region was also located further from the flame centerline for the higher flow rate flames because of the difference in luminous flame shape. At 0.48 mg/s, the fraction of carbon in the fuel converted into soot was between 0.1 % and 1.2 % in the sub-atmospheric pressure range, from 0.2 atm to 1 atm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it