Stable lymphocyte contact induces remodeling of endothelial cell matrix receptor complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endothelial cells (EC) actively participate in lymphocyte transendothelial migration by remodeling their actin cytoskeleton. We studied the endothelial cell abluminal matrix receptor (focal adhesion, FA) complexes to determine if these structures were remodeled following lymphocyte adhesion. Lymphocytes (PBL) were isolated from whole blood and added to cultured EC. Lectin-stimulated PBL adhered to EC spontaneously, whereas adhesion of freshly isolated lymphocytes to EC was induced by pre-treatment with MCP-1 or activating anti-CD11a mAb. Sustained adhesion between lymphocytes and EC resulted in a significant, contact-dependent decrease in paxillin incorporation into the FA following 15, but not 5, min of contact. EC FA remodeling was associated with increased phosphorylation of pp125 FA kinase. Pretreatment of the EC with an activating beta1 integrin monoclonal antibody, TS2/16, prevented lymphocyte-stimulated FA remodeling. Further, TS2/16 pretreatment inhibited transendothelial migration of lymphocytes and beta1 integrin-deficient JY lymphoblasts. These data demonstrate that sustained lymphocyte adhesion induces remodeling of EC FA structures and that this remodeling event is required for efficient lymphocyte transendothelial migration in vitro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".