MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139427787 · doi:10.1002/masy.201300048

An In‐Situ <scp>NMR</scp> Study of Radical Copolymerization Kinetics of Acrylamide and Non‐<scp>I</scp>onized Acrylic Acid in Aqueous Solution

2013· article· en· W2139427787 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Symposia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonomerCopolymerAcrylic acidAqueous solutionAcrylamidePolymer chemistryKineticsIsothermal processReactivity (psychology)ChemistryAqueous two-phase systemMaterials sciencePolymerOrganic chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary An in‐situ NMR technique has been developed to study the aqueous phase copolymerization of non‐ionized acrylic acid (AA) and acrylamide (AM) under near‐isothermal conditions at much higher monomer contents than previously reported in the literature. The composition data obtained over the entire conversion range provides a precise estimate of monomer reactivity ratios not available from low conversion data. The set of experiments, with initial monomer content in aqueous solution varied between 5 and 40%, were well‐fit over the complete conversion range by r AA = 1.24 ± 0.02, and r AM = 0.55 ± 0.01. It was found that the rate of monomer conversion increases with increasing monomer concentration, a trend contrary to the known decrease in the AA and AM chain‐end propagation rate coefficients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it