MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139445314 · doi:10.1175/2403.1

Direct Numerical Simulation of Differential Scalar Diffusion in Three-Dimensional Stratified Turbulence

2003· article· en· W2139445314 on OpenAlexafffund
Ann E. Gargett, William J. Merryfield, Greg Holloway

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Oceanography · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsNorth Pacific Marine Science OrganizationPacific Institute for Climate Solutions
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsTurbulenceScalar (mathematics)Direct numerical simulationPhysicsThermal diffusivityTurbulent diffusionDiffusionMechanicsStratification (seeds)Stratified flowReynolds numberStratified flowsTurbulence kinetic energyStatistical physicsThermodynamicsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The potential for differential turbulent transport of oceanic temperature (T) and salinity (𝒮) is explored using three-dimensional direct numerical simulations of decaying stratified turbulence. The simulations employ a realistic molecular diffusion coefficient for T, and one for a “salt” scalar S that is 10 times smaller. Initially, a uniformly stratified medium is disturbed by a turbulent burst whose initial energy is assigned a range of values. In each instance, transports of T integrated over the subsequent decay of the burst exceed those of S. The more energetic cases occupy parameter ranges similar to, and exhibit spectral characteristics that are essentially indistinguishable from, those of direct observations of turbulence in the stratified ocean interior. In these cases, the turbulent diffusivity of T exceeds that of S by 6%–22%. These simulations underestimate the degree of differential diffusion between T and salinity 𝒮 (which has a molecular diffusivity 100 times less than T); thus at the Reynolds numbers attained by the simulations these results constitute lower bounds for differential diffusion associated with sporadic turbulence in the ocean. The simulation results are consistent with previous laboratory and two-dimensional numerical experiments and suggest that the assumption of equal turbulent diffusivities for T and 𝒮, commonly used in circulation modeling and in interpreting oceanic mixing measurements, should be reconsidered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical OceanographySame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207