MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139516143 · doi:10.5267/j.esm.2014.8.005

Systematic design of an atmospheric data acquisition flying vehicle telemetry system

2014· article· en· W2139516143 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vahid Bohlouri, Amirreza Kosari, MRM Aliha

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Solid Mechanics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelemetryInterfacingData acquisitionMicrocontrollerInterface (matter)Computer scienceWirelessSoftwareGlobal Positioning SystemComputer hardwareReal-time computingEngineeringEmbedded systemElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we have provided hands-on experience in systematic design, implementation and flight test of an atmospheric data acquisition flying vehicle as a standard CanSat telemetry mission.This system is designed for launching from a rocket at a separation altitude about 1000-meter.During its flight, the reusable flying vehicle collects environmental data and transmits it directly to the ground station.The ground station, which is implemented at a predefined radio frequency band receives data and plots the respective graphs.The design performs based on a systematic approach, in which the first step is set aside to mission and objectives definition.In the next step, the system requirements are identified and the required main subsystems and elements with their technical requirements will be extracted.The structure analyses were also performed by ABAQUS software to obtain the natural frequency and the mode shape.The wireless communications, onboard microcontroller programming, sensor interfacing and analog to digital conversion describe the basic technologies employed in the system implementation.This flying vehicle in comparison with the other similar ones is more lightweight, has few interface circuits and high precision sensors.According to the flight test outputs, low power consumption, high transmit line up to 2Km despite of limitation in TX power and up to 10g normal acceleration withstanding are important specific characteristics of the implemented flying system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Solid MechanicsSame topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207