MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139518258 · doi:10.1002/gcc.1170

Mutation analysis of the <i>CDKN2A</i> promoter in Australian melanoma families

2001· article· en· W2139518258 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pamela M. Pollock, Mitchell Stark, Jane M. Palmer, Marilyn K. Walters, Joanne F. Aitken, Nicholas G. Martin, Nicholas K. Hayward

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes Chromosomes and Cancer · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneticsCDKN2AProbandCoding regionBiologyExonStart codonMutationHaplotypeUntranslated regionPoint mutationStop codonGeneAlleleRNAMessenger RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Approximately 50% of all melanoma families worldwide show linkage to 9p21‐22, but only about half of these have been shown to contain germ line CDKN2A mutations. It has been hypothesized that a proportion of these families carry mutations in the noncoding regions of CDKN2A. Several Canadian families have been reported to carry a mutation in the 5′ UTR, at position −34 relative to the start site, which gives rise to a novel AUG translation initiation codon that markedly decreases translation from the wild‐type AUG (Liu et al., 1999 ). Haplotype sharing in these Canadian families suggested that this mutation is of British origin. We sequenced 1,327 base pairs (bp) of CDKN2A, making up 1,116 bp of the 5′ UTR and promoter, all of exon 1, and 61 bp of intron 1, in at least one melanoma case from 110 Australian families with three or more affected members known not to carry mutations within the p16 coding region. In addition, 431 bp upstream of the start codon was sequenced in an additional 253 affected probands from two‐case melanoma families for which the CDKN2A mutation status was unknown. Several known polymorphisms at positions −33, −191, −493, and −735 were detected, in addition to four novel variants at positions 120, −252, −347, and −981 relative to the start codon. One of the probands from a two‐case family was found to have the previously reported Q50R mutation. No family member was found to carry the mutation at position −34 or any other disease‐associated mutation. For further investigation of noncoding CDKN2A mutations that may affect transcription, allele‐specific expression analysis was carried out in 31 of the families with at least three affected members who showed either complete or “indeterminate” 9p haplotype sharing without CDKN2A exonic mutations. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and automated sequencing showed expression of both CDKN2A alleles in all family members tested. The lack of CDKN2A promoter mutations and the absence of transcriptional silencing in the germ line of this cohort of families suggest that mutations in the promoter and 5′ UTR play a very limited role in melanoma predisposition. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes Chromosomes and CancerSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207