Intraluminal ultrasonic probe for volumetric monitoring of liquid gastroesophageal reflux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methods for volumetric monitoring of liquid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are still lacking. The aim of this study was to develop an automated intraluminal measurement technique which allows ambulatory volumetric quantification of liquid GER utilizing a minimum-cost intraluminal ultrasonic probe. This probe consists of two 2 MHz ultrasonic crystals longitudinally assembled along a multi-channel intraluminal impedance (MII) catheter. The proposed probe was initially tested with tubular phantoms of different diameters. Measurements of the cross-sectional areas of the phantoms showed high correlation with the actual areas (R(2) = 0.99). Subsequently, two in-vivo human tests were performed. For each human test the catheter assembly was inserted transnasally and the ultrasonic probe was placed in the area of the lower esophageal sphincter. Multiple liquid swallows of different volumes were invoked using electrolyte drinks. Sectional luminal volume (SLV) in the esophagus between the two ultrasonic crystals was obtained. Results of the swallows demonstrated that measured SLVs correlated with the actual swallowed liquid volume. The ultrasonic probe was combined with a MII catheter to discriminate between antegrade and retrograde bolus transit. Increases of SLVs during liquid GER episodes could be utilized to evaluate GER volume in the vicinity of the ultrasonic probe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".