Kajian Implementasi Rencana Kedaruratan Nuklir Kanada untuk Mendukung Rencana Pembangunan Sistem Kedaruratan Nuklir Nasional (Halaman 113 s.d. 116)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kajian Implementasi Rencana Kedaruratan Nuklir Kanada Untuk Mendukung Rencana Pembangunan Sistem Kedaruratan Nuklir Nasional. Kajian implementasi rencana kedaruratan nuklir Kanada meliputi studi laporan dan kajian awal kedaruratan, pengaktifan struktur pendukung nasional, dan implementasi rencana kedaruratan nuklir federal Kanada. Aktivasi struktur pendukung nasional, meliputi tingkat pengaktifan struktur pendukung nasional dan hubungan dengan CNSC (Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission). Dalam implementasi tersebut diidentifikasi para pihak pemangku kepentingan yang terkait (stakeholders), penentuan tingkat kedaruratan nuklir yang mungkin terjadi dan rencana antisipasi dan ketersediaan dukungan infrastruktur yang terkait. Selain itu dalam kajian ini dibahas dan dibandingkan kesiapan implementasi rencana kedaruratan nuklir di Indonesia setelah DPR memutuskan energi nuklir bukan lagi sebagai energi alternatif dalam bauran energi nasional pada awal tahun 2014. Kajian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode studi literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".