MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139578446 · doi:10.1002/dvdy.22426

Molecular cloning and embryonic expression of zebrafish PCSK5 co‐orthologues: Functional assessment during lateral line development

2010· article· en· W2139578446 on OpenAlexafffund
Babykumari P. Chitramuthu, David Baranowski, Benoît Cadieux, Estelle Rousselet, Nabil G. Seidah, H.P.J. Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Dynamics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalMontreal Clinical Research InstituteMcGill University Health CentreRoyal Victoria Regional Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyOtic vesicleZebrafishLateral lineKexinCell biologyProteasesSubtilisinGeneticsGeneComplementary DNAGene expressionMolecular biologyIn situ hybridizationBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pro-protein convertase subtilisin/kexin 5 (PC5, also known as PC6) is a member of the subtilisin-like superfamily of serine proteases implicated in the maturation of latent precursor proteins into their functionally active derivatives. To investigate the functional roles, we have cloned the cDNA sequences encoding two candidate zebrafish PC5 convertases (designated as PCSK5.1 and PCSK5.2) co-orthologous to the single PC5 encoding gene (PCSK5) found in mammals. Both display syntenic correspondence to the human PCSK5 gene. Overall gene architecture has been conserved across species. While PC5.1 mRNA expression is very discrete within the otic vesicle and lateral line neuromasts, PC5.2 transcripts are more ubiquitously expressed within the central nervous system together with specific localization in various organs including liver, intestine, and otic vesicle. Zebrafish PC5.1-deficient embryos display abnormal neuromast deposition within the lateral line system and lack a normal touch response, consistent with the known sensory role that the lateral line plays in spatial awareness and sensing the environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental DynamicsSame topicCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207