MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139591904

Food and feeding ecology of the sympatric thin-billed <i>Pachyptila belcheri</i> and Antarctic <i>P. desolata</i> prions at Iles Kerguelen, Southern Indian Ocean

2002· preprint· en· W2139591904 on OpenAlexaff
Yves Cherel, Pierrick Bocher, Claude De Broyer, Keith A. Hobson

Bibliographic record

VenueFlanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute) · 2002
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEuphausiaEcologyTrophic levelAntarctic krillPredationEuphausiaceaCrustaceanFeatherZooplanktonForagingMoultingZoologyDiel vertical migrationKrillLarva
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The food and feeding ecology of the 2 closely related species of prions <i>Pachyptila belcheri</i> and <i>P. desolata</i> was investigated over 3 consecutive chick-rearing periods at Iles Kerguelen, the only place where they nest sympatrically in large numbers. In all years, the 2 prion species fed on crustaceans, with a small proportion of mesopelagic fish and squid. The hyperiid amphipod <i>Themisto gaudichaudii</i> was consistently the dominant prey item, accounting for 76 and 70% by number, and 57 and 57% by reconstituted mass of the diet of <i>P. belcheri</i> and <i>P. desolata</i>, respectively. Prions, however, were segregated by feeding on different euphausiids, <i>P. belcheri</i> on <i>Thysanoessa</i> sp. (18% by number and 16% by mass) and <i>P. desolata</i> on <i>Euphausia vallentini</i> (9% by number and 15% by mass). <i>P. desolata</i> also caught more small prey such as copepods (9 vs <1% by number) and cypris larvae of <i>Lepas australis</i> (8 vs 3% by number) than <i>P. belcheri</i>, which can be related to the beak filtering apparatus present only in the former species. Biogeography of the prey and their state of digestion indicate that prions foraged in a wide variety of marine habitats, including the kelp belt, kelp rafts, and coastal, neritic and oceanic waters. Noticeable is the occurrence of <i>E. superba</i> in a significant number of food samples (15 and 10% for <i>P. belcheri</i> and <i>P. desolata</i>, respectively), suggesting feeding in distant foraging grounds in southern Antarctic waters, >1000 km from the breeding colonies, during the chick-rearing period. The stable-carbon and -nitrogen isotopic compositions of chick feathers were identical in both species, indicating no important trophic segregation during the breeding period, when adult birds are central-place foragers. The ratios were, however, different in adult feathers, suggesting moulting in Antarctic waters for <i>P. belcheri</i> and in subtropical waters for <i>P. desolata</i>, i.e. in distinct foraging areas when birds are not constrained to return to the colonies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.015
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFlanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute)Same topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207